Legal

Reverse Hijacking

When a trademark owner makes false claims to steal a legitimately registered domain — an abuse of the dispute process.

What Is Reverse Hijacking?

Reverse domain name hijacking (RDNH) occurs when a trademark owner abuses the UDRP or other dispute resolution process by filing a bad-faith complaint to take a domain from someone who has a legitimate right to it. It's the mirror image of cybersquatting — instead of a squatter stealing a trademark, a trademark owner tries to steal a domain.

RDNH findings are made by UDRP panels when they determine that a complaint was brought in bad faith — for example, when the complainant knows the registrant has a legitimate interest in the domain but files the dispute anyway. An RDNH finding doesn't impose penalties but damages the complainant's reputation and is publicly recorded.

Common RDNH scenarios include: companies filing disputes over generic dictionary words that happen to match their brand, entities trying to grab domains registered long before the trademark existed, and serial trademark filers targeting domains to build UDRP cases.

Why This Matters for Startups

Reverse hijacking is relevant from two angles. If you register a generic domain and a company later tries to take it through UDRP because they share the same word, you may be a victim of reverse hijacking. If you're considering filing a UDRP against a domain that was registered before your trademark existed, or that uses a generic term, consult a domain attorney first — filing a weak case could result in an RDNH finding against you.

Link copied!

Ready to Find Your Startup's Domain?

Browse our curated collection of premium domains or get a free appraisal on any name.

Browse Premium Domains
← Back to Dictionary